Our Website Uses Cookies 


We and the third parties that provide content, functionality, or business services on our website may use cookies to collect information about your browsing activities in order to provide you with more relevant content and promotional materials, on and off the website, and help us understand your interests and improve the website.


For more information, please contact us or consult our Privacy Notice.

Your binder contains too many pages, the maximum is 40.

We are unable to add this page to your binder, please try again later.

This page has been added to your binder.

U.S. ex rel. Proctor v. Safeway, Inc.: When “Subjective Intent Is Legally Irrelevant” to Proving Scienter Under the FCA

July 6, 2020, Covington Advisory

The False Claims Act (FCA) only imposes liability on those who “knowingly” cause the submission of false claims. 31 U.S.C. § 3729. “Knowingly” is defined as having “actual knowledge,” acting “in deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the information,” or, at minimum, acting “in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information.” To establish scienter under this standard, qui tam relators frequently invoke evidence, such as internal emails and policy documents, to show that the defendant was subjectively aware of legal requirements but did not follow them.

Share this article: