Our Website Uses Cookies 

We and the third parties that provide content, functionality, or business services on our website may use cookies to collect information about your browsing activities in order to provide you with more relevant content and promotional materials, on and off the website, and help us understand your interests and improve the website.

For more information, please contact us or consult our Privacy Notice.

Your binder contains too many pages, the maximum is 40.

We are unable to add this page to your binder, please try again later.

This page has been added to your binder.

Bilateral deal could defuse Sino-U.S. tension over Chinese M&A

November 26, 2016, Asia Times

Marney Cheek is quoted in an Asia Times article regarding the use of a bilateral investment treaty (BIT) to defuse Sino-U.S. tension over acquisitions. According to Cheek, “Successful negotiation of a U.S.-China BIT has never been more important.” She continues, “An agreement would provide legal certainty for foreign investors from both countries at a very uncertain time. With the threat of a trade war on the horizon, the BIT would pull in the opposite direction, showing a commitment on both sides to the core principles of open markets and nondiscrimination.”

Cheek notes that U.S. industry has strongly supported a U.S.-China BIT as a way to nix investment barriers and increase transparency. She says discrimination in favor of state-owned-enterprises “comes in many flavors in China,” and that an investment treaty would tamp down on what some see as a pervasive thumb on the scale for domestic Chinese companies.

“But the treaty is a two-way street,” Cheek adds. “Given the anti-China rhetoric in Washington right now on trade and investment issues, China should welcome a BIT that guarantees Chinese investors access to certain U.S. industry sectors and commits the U.S. to principles of nondiscrimination.”


Share this article: