Our Website Uses Cookies 

We and the third parties that provide content, functionality, or business services on our website may use cookies to collect information about your browsing activities in order to provide you with more relevant content and promotional materials, on and off the website, and help us understand your interests and improve the website.

For more information, please contact us or consult our Privacy Notice.

Your binder contains too many pages, the maximum is 40.

We are unable to add this page to your binder, please try again later.

This page has been added to your binder.

US House privacy bill differs from Senate counterparts

January 13, 2020, Global Data Review

Lindsey Tonsager is quoted in Global Data Review regarding a recently released draft privacy bill from the US House Committee on Energy & Commerce which differs from current Senate bills. With roughly a quarter of House Democrats coming from California, Ms. Tonsager told GDR that there will be major opposition to pre-emption in the House. “We’ve already seen the California block in the House speaking very vocally that they don’t want preemption,” she says. On the other hand, state legislative activity will put more pressure on Congress to establish a baseline standard, she adds. “A federal standard is important – particularly important since New Hampshire, Virginia, Illinois and Nebraska have already introduced state bills in 2020.”

Share this article: