Our Website Uses Cookies 

We and the third parties that provide content, functionality, or business services on our website may use cookies to collect information about your browsing activities in order to provide you with more relevant content and promotional materials, on and off the website, and help us understand your interests and improve the website.

For more information, please contact us or consult our Privacy Notice.

Your binder contains too many pages, the maximum is 40.

We are unable to add this page to your binder, please try again later.

This page has been added to your binder.

Udit Sood helps innovators solve complex legal problems that call for a rigorous understanding of science. He focuses his practice on high-stakes litigation, particularly intellectual property disputes, involving innovations in biotechnology, satellite Internet, set-top boxes, slot machines, cellular communications infrastructure, and information security. He also represents clients in disputes involving unfair competition and antitrust laws.

  • Defending Hewlett Packard Enterprise against Russian telecom provider MegaFon’s allegations that HPE misrepresented its expertise in order to win a bid for designing and implementing advanced telecom infrastructure.
  • Represented leading pharmaceutical company in a trade secret and breach of contract arbitration involving ultra-rapid insulin formulations, obtaining complete defense victory against claimant’s demands totaling more than $1.8 billion.
  • Represented Israeli defense company Elbit Systems Ltd. in Eastern District of Texas lawsuit alleging infringement of its patents relating to satellite communication technology by a global provider of satellite-based Internet services.
  • Represented Aristocrat Technologies in patent litigation in the District of Nevada relating to slot machine technology, including preparation of inter-partes review (IPR) petition challenging validity of opposing party’s design patent.
  • Advised a global interactive television company on multiple district court and ITC actions involving the company’s patents on various set-top box related technologies.
  • Represented Samsung in a patent infringement action at the ITC brought by Creative Technology Ltd. involving media organization capabilities in smartphones.
  • Advised multinational consumer electronics manufacturer specializing in audio technologies on potential FRAND violations by holder of patents essential to various ATSC, BDA and ETSI standards, and advised on litigation strategy.
  • Advised leading operator of Internet infrastructure, including the authoritative registry for some of the Internet’s most prominent top-level domains, on enforcement of its cyber-security related IP against potential infringers.
  • Represented Indian OEMs in defensive infringement action involving standard essential patents (GSM, 2G and 3G) before the Delhi High Court and the Competition Commission of India.
  • Lead associate in bringing a trade secrets and breach of confidentiality action on behalf of a leading multinational IT staffing company in a district court in Bangalore. Prepared and filed complaint, obtained an ex parte injunction and secured a favorable settlement all within a few weeks.
  • Represented a multinational technology company in copyright infringement suit concerning content in third party mobile applications before the Delhi High Court.
  • Represented generic drug manufacturer in defensive patent litigation involving breast cancer medication.
  • Represented leading seeds manufacturer in India in offensive litigation asserting breach of confidentiality and infringement of the sui generis statutory IP rights in seeds.
  • Represented Cricbuzz.com in a defensive unfair competition suit before the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India.
  • Represented easyGroup (UK) and affiliated companies in a trademark infringement suit involving the “EASYJET” mark before the Delhi High Court. Presented closing arguments in part, secured an injunction, damages of INR 500,000 as well as litigation costs.
  • Represented the collecting society, Indian Performing Right Society (IPRS), before the Supreme Court of India in opposing a challenge to the constitutionality of the Indian Copyright Act concerning music royalties brought by the Federation of Hotel and Restaurant Associations of India.

Pro Bono

  • Anderson et al v. SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment - Representing plaintiffs in the Northern District of California against SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment for disseminating false and misleading advertising relating to the care and treatment of its captive orcas.
  • Robinson v. Dignity Health - Represented transgender man in Title VII lawsuit in Northern District of California against employer for blanket exclusion of gender reassignment surgery from medical insurance plan.
  • Minna Saran et al v. Suresh Kumar Koushal & Union of India - Represented parents of LGBT persons in petition before the Supreme Court of India for reconsideration of its ruling “recriminalizing” homosexuality in India.